Vogue and the big butt argument

There’s a lot to unpack here, so let’s start with the fact of Vogue and the big butt arguementdiscussing the “big booty” without referencing women of color. To do so “perpetuates the idea that curves are new, trendy, covetable accessories, thereby dismissing women of color whose curves existed long before it was fashionable to have them, and whose bodies have been critiqued throughout history” (as Carimah Townes wrote for Think Progress in response to Vanity Fair’s Jen Selter story). Author of the Vogue piece, Patricia Garcia, even goes so far as to include Miley Cyrus in the movement, saying she “proved you didn’t need to have a large butt to become a part of the conversation.” It’s bad enough to ignore African American and Latino women who have proudly been part of this butt “conversation” since the dawn of humanity. Giving credit to an individual who actively accessorizes herself with these women is just irresponsible.

Probably the most egregious aspect of the whole thing is that Vogue alleges a big butt is something women have been required to try to get rid of. “For years it was exactly the opposite,” Garcia writes. “A large butt was not something one aspired to, rather something one tried to tame in countless exercise classes.” That statement buys so whole-heartedly into the idea of a societally dictated body type it should make you want to drown in an over-priced kale smoothie. In spite of Vogue’s lack of approval, there are plenty of women who have not spent all previous decades aspiring to whittle themselves down via Soul Cycle.

Overall, the daunting reality is that what’s most visible in pop culture — on our magazine covers, television shows and runways — often becomes the desired look. The way Vogue participates in this (i.e. that they feel they should be applauded for discovering that other bodies exist in 2014) is hugely problematic. Their role in culture contributes to and reflects a very real (and totally myopic) world view. All of the white people who think twerking is a 2013 invention also probably see the celebration of big booties as a newfound thing, because it is suddenly being embraced and recognized by white culture. That sucks, and we can (and should) make fun of it, but maybe there’s a glimmer of hope in all the offensive ridiculousness at play here.

We don’t need Vogue to believe in big booties for them to exist. We don’t need Vogue’s acknowledgement of any body part or type. That’s the real power of J.Lo’s role as a “trailblazing butt girl,” as Garcia called her. She represents not just the glory of her backside, but the confident presentation of a form that falls far outside the size zero standard. Reducing that to the idea that a specific body part is something that’s really hot right now just creates one more box for women to be placed in and ignores the value of all other bodies. That’s precisely the kind of thinking we need to break from in order to truly be free of the unrealistic images we’ve been bombarded with since the premiere issue of Vogue. Body diversity is important whether the aesthetic ideals of the fashion world choose to acknowledge diverse bodies or not. Anyone who doesn’t understand that is welcome to kiss our big, small and medium-sized butts.

Likes:
0 0
Views:
135
Article Categories:
Edition 77September 2014

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.