No Africa City made the World’s Best Cities as Canberra, Bergen and Singapore feature among the world’s leading cities for quality of life in 2026, according to Oxford Economics’ Global Cities Index, which assesses 1,000 cities worldwide based on factors including income levels, housing affordability, safety, life expectancy and access to recreational and cultural facilities.
According to visualcapitalist.com, Canberra earns a perfect index score of 100, making it the highest-ranked city for Quality of Life in 2026. Oxford Economics attributes its performance to a combination of high salaries and relatively low income inequality, supported by the Australian capital’s concentration of stable, well-paying government jobs.
Canberra also performs well on life expectancy and benefits from a high number of recreation and cultural sites relative to its population. Interestingly, Canberra ranks only 45th in the overall Global Cities Index, showing how a city can excel in quality of life without ranking among the world’s top cities overall.
By region, Europe dominates the ranking, led by Bergen, Grenoble, Bern, and Oslo.
Germany has an especially strong showing, with Dresden, Berlin, Munich, Stuttgart, and Freiburg im Breisgau all appearing in the top 21. Switzerland places three cities in the top 14: Bern, Basel, and Zurich. Italy also contributes three cities to the top 30, including Venice, Padua, and Genoa.

Outside Europe, the leading cities include Canberra and Sydney in Australia, Singapore, San Jose and Seattle in the United States, and Hsinchu and Taipei in Taiwan.
How U.S. Cities Perform
The United States dominates several measures of global city competitiveness, but its performance in quality of life tells a different story.
According to Oxford Economics, U.S. cities generally excel in Economics and Human Capital, while European cities tend to perform better in Quality of Life, Environment, and Governance.
New York, for example, ranks 1st overall but 86th for Quality of Life. Oxford Economics notes that high housing costs weigh on the city’s score, even as New York benefits from high incomes and strong access to recreation and cultural sites.
Why Some Cities Don’t Make the List
Some cities commonly associated with high livability fall outside the top 30, largely because of housing costs.
Copenhagen, for instance, ranks 18th overall but 160th for Quality of Life, with Oxford Economics pointing to limited and expensive housing as the main drag. The city performs much better in Governance, where it ranks first globally, as well as Environment and Economics.
Vancouver shows a similar gap, ranking 24th overall but 215th for Quality of Life. Exceptionally high housing expenditure weighs on its score despite its outdoor amenities and long life expectancy